Senate Approves Ban on Antigay Bias in Workplace

By
Published: November 7, 2013 - New York Times

WASHINGTON — The Senate on Thursday approved a ban on discrimination in the workplace based on sexual orientation and gender identity, voting 64 to 32 in a bipartisan show of support that is rare for any social issue. It was the first time in the institutionfs history that it had voted to include gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people in the countryfs nondiscrimination law.

Despite initial wariness among many Republicans about the bill, 10 of them voted with 54 members of the Democratic majority to approve the measure.

But nothing is guaranteed in the House, where Speaker John A. Boehner has repeatedly said he opposes the bill.

President Obama hailed the Senate action and urged House Republican leaders to bring the bill to the floor for a vote.

gOne party in one house of Congress should not stand in the way of millions of Americans who want to go to work each day and simply be judged by the job they do,h Mr. Obama said in a statement. gNow is the time to end this kind of discrimination in the workplace, not enable it.h

Senator Harry Reid, the majority leader, said on Thursday that gthe time has come for Congress to pass a federal law that ensures all citizens, regardless of where they live, can go to work not afraid of who they are.h He noted that a vast majority of Americans already think such a law is in place. gWell, it isnft already the law,h he added. gLetfs do what the American people think already exists.h

Senate Republicans who voted against the bill, known as the Employment Nondiscrimination Act, were muted in their opposition. The first senator to rise and speak against the bill on the floor all week was Dan Coats of Indiana, who said Thursday morning that religious freedoms were at risk, despite the billfs broad exemption for religious institutions.

Those exemptions, he said, did not go far enough.

gWe canft pick and choose when to adhere to the Constitution, and when to cast it aside,h Mr. Coats said. gThe so-called protections from religious liberty in this bill are vaguely defined and do not extend to all organizations that wish to adhere to their moral or religious beliefs in their hiring practices.h

The bill includes a number of protections for religious entities, some of which were added this week to gain more Republican support. It now contains a provision that says no federal agency or state or local government that accepts money from the federal government can retaliate against religious institutions for not complying. This would include actions like denying them tax-exempt status, grant money, licenses or certifications.

The institutions that are exempt from the bill include churches, synagogues and mosques that are expressly religious in nature. This would also extend to schools or retail stores affiliated directly with churches, but it would not apply to those that have only loose religious affiliations.